Refine your search

COMET: Weak-tie hypothesis in complex digital networks´s Profile image

COMET: Weak-tie hypothesis in complex digital networks

Project
01.09.2024 - 31.08.2028
School of Humanities, Philosophical Faculty

Funders

Research Council of Finland

Academy project funded by the Research Council of Finland (2024-2028)

Leaders

Introducing image of the groupCOMET: Weak-tie hypothesis in complex digital networks

(from left to right) Juhani Järviö, Pasi Fränti, Rahel Albicker, Mikko Laitinen (PI), Irene Taipale, Paula Rautionaho, Chunyuan Nie, Mehrdad Salimi, Masoud Fatemi

This project, funded by the Research Council of Finland for 2024-28, focuses on studying how innovations spread in social networks. Social network theory predicts that innovations and new ideas spread most effectively through individuals who are loosely connected in networks. Numerous observations from a range of fields support this theory, but their evidence is mainly based on very small networks. This cross-disciplinary project tests the validity of the theory by examining how linguistic innovations spread in extremely large social media networks. The group brings together leading computational humanities experts, sociolinguists and computer scientists.

In addition to advancing basic research, this project leads to considerable societal impact, since the technical tools developed can be used to model the spread of disinformation in social media effectively.

News

COMET researchers win Best Paper Award

Masoud Fatemi, Mikko Laitinen and Pasi Fränti have been awarded the Best Paper prize at ISKE2025 conference in China! The title of the paper is “Clustering Digital Ego Networks by Tie Strength: A Scalable, Platform-independent Method”.

Abstract:

This study presents a scalable method to classify online social networks based on tie strength. Utilizing ego networks from Twitter, we applied four measurable features—interaction strength, relative interaction strength, social similarity, and outlier ratio—to cluster over 8,000 networks into four categories: weak, moderately-weak, moderately-strong, and strong ties. Our approach is not platform-dependent and overcomes the limitations of previous methods that relied on fixed thresholds or manual labeling. The results reveal regional and gender-based differences in tie strength patterns: Nordic users tend to form weaker ties, while users in Australia, the UK, and the US are more likely to build stronger-tie networks. Male users dominate across all tie categories, while female and uncategorized users are more common in weaker networks. The findings can support research in online social behavior, content delivery, and information diffusion.

Files

1 items

Keywords

Publications

11 items